|
|
FitnessProsBooks.com - Into the Wild
|
List Price: $29.98
Our Price: $13.49
Your Save: $ 16.49 ( 55% )
Availability: Usually ships in 7 to 11 days
Manufacturer: Paramount
Starring: Emile Hirsch, Vince Vaughn, Catherine Keener, Marcia Gay Harden, William Hurt
Directed By: Sean Penn
|
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Audience Rating: R (Restricted)
Binding: DVD
Brand: Paramount
EAN: 0097363481249
Format: AC-3
Label: Paramount
Manufacturer: Paramount
Number Of Items: 1
Publisher: Paramount
Region Code: 1
Release Date: 2008-03-04
Running Time: 148
Studio: Paramount
Theatrical Release Date: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Paging Paul Harvey ... for the rest of the story!
Comment: First, I'll get my admitted bias out of the way: Whenever 'Hollywood' gets a hold of something that is hawked as "based on true events", this should be a huge red flag to viewers that they should make it their business to research the alleged "based on true events" in order to separate the Hollywood tendency to engage in both directorial "creative license" and "for the sake of the plot" alterations. Unfortunately, there are folks who see the proverbial 'Silver Screen' [or book [Jon Krakauer] for that matter] version of the alleged "facts" and that's the end of it.
So too, there is in this particular case both in the book and in the subsequent movie to 'romanticize' Chris McCandless and that his eventual death by starvation, yes, I said 'starvation' and not plant poisoning, and his venturing into the wilderness only to die there was somehow a "noble cause" [!] and, what then, worthy of emulation?
Take the time to read the autopsy report and the additional [which later morphed to 'moldy seeds' which purportedly prevents the digestion process and hence 'kills over time'] when the plant poisoning per se could not be scientifically supported [after analysis] and note the differences in the plant 'culprit' between the book and the movie] with regard to the alleged death via accidental plant poisoning. Some even suggest it was on purpose for the, and I quote now, "ultimate self-sacrifice statement" [sic]! Look at the list of those things found in Chris's possession when he was found dead in the bus by moose hunters 'including' a map and including, inter alia, money found in a compartment of his pack. And while some may actually 'relate' to previous wordage from McCandless where his parents were relegated by him as "idiots" [sic], it remains interesting that his otherwise close sibling relationship to his sister finds her written off for two years as well ... along with the rest of society in general save for those who could assist Chris in his singular quest for both Thoreau-like isolation and Jack London type wilderness living albeit in a most unforgiving environment. And no prior experience in such endeavors.
There is a DVD out by Ron Lamothe [Terra Incognita Films -- see their website and read the Krakauer book rebuttal piece] based on a Chris McCandless documentary and decidedly worth a look. It's called "The Call of the Wild." Hence my Paul Harvey analogy and "the rest of the story." So too, there are countless essays on the matter but various of which offer 'documented' input [versus conjecture] that was not incorporated into the Jon Krakauer book nor the subsequent 2007 Sean Penn film nor corrected therein [although Krakauer 'modified' his view on the plant poisoning to a matter of inherently poisonous 'moldy seeds'] when the 'rest of the story' was related. There have also been essays with regard to psychological/psychiatric issues and worth reading. Interesting here too when such 'mental' facility issues are discussed at various and sundry websites with regard to the actions of Chris McCandless, there is almost always various voices 'countering' such psychological/psychiatric speculation and protracted discussion as "pure hogwash" [sic] via the old chestnut defense of "medicalizing dissent" as if to suggest that McCandless actions were perfectly normal and "entirely sane" and "happen all the time" ...]. What may also amaze readers is the myriad of websites out there where everything from Alaska folks 'per se' are supposedly "all anti-McCandless haters by nature" [! -- sic] or "Society 'is' sick, overly materialistic and evil [...] Chris did what he had to do!" [! -- sic] but then as more than a few wags put it, "... when you abandon your family, your car, your friends and you give away all your money [$24,000 grad school savings] and burn the rest on hand and head for the wilderness for which you are totally ill prepared to deal with and survive in the process .. this is not so much an attempt to 'find yourself', as much as a matter of already being quite lost!"
Read 'the rest of the story' -- it's out there and if 'only' to get a balance between the book and the movie. Then, well, you make the call but a call in 'addition' to the book/movie version of the events.
So why the 3 stars in my review, you ask? Fair question: The movie was very well acted! I think Emile Hirsch gave a great performance as did the supporting cast. It's the 'facts' however of the "based on true events" that account for the missing stars. As I said a la Paul Harvey, 'the rest of the story.' Check it out!
Doc Tony
Customer Rating:
Summary: Tediously boring and poorly acted
Comment: I tried to watch and even enjoy this film...
god bless all who dare view it.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Free at Last
Comment: What i Got out of this movie was simply that this young man lacked nothing materially, but was starved for a relationship with his dad and mom, and had the father wound so common for american young men... having grown up with hard working dads who come home at night spent, and who spend lots of time assembling their portfolios and place their security in how much money they have and what status level they are at, how many toys they have..ect ect.. this young man had probably been told most of his life what to do, how to do it, and this is what success is blah blah... you must look like this, act like this, go here and do this and he was damn tired of it, and wanted to find out who he really was, and if it was impossible to find himself in the presence of his family then he had to get away, and if they had any knowledge of where he was they would probably be sending him money, instruction and advice, and trying to tell him every move to make... so he broke away... and by degrees he grew up and began to see what was really important in life and to find the healing he didnt even realize he needed... the fact that he made mistakes and died as a result does not take away from the movie at all. to me the movie was a true story of the journey we are all on, and the goal is not to die with the most toys or to be a big shot know it all, but to live well and to learn that we all make mistakes and need to learn to forgive and grow and love and to " Call Things by their Right Name" and in this regard i think this young man was a success.
Customer Rating:
Summary: One of the best of 2007
Comment: I knew nothing of Christopher McCandless or the book of his life or even anything about this movie until I was sitting in the cinema. The only thing I knew is that Sean Penn was directing and having been very impressed with his gut-wrenching, if incredibly downbeat, The Pledge I was pretty much guaranteed to like this film. My guess turned out to be extremely correct.
Alexander Supertramp (that's Emile Hirsch as McCandless folks) is a man with no attachments. Having been raised in a loveless household by parents who only wish for him to 'or-din-ary' things he entertains them as far as graduating college but escapes to the country as soon as the diploma is in his hands.
His dream is to explore the land with no ID, no money and no chance of being found by those who might want to interfere with his mission of reaching peaceful seclusion in a remote corner of Alaska. Along the way he touches many lives, some brief, some profound and gains experience and character that some might never have even if they lived to a hundred.
Sean Penn's photography and affection for nature give this film an overall gorgeous look. It is surely one of the most uniquely composed films of the year. He reminds me a lot of Clint Eastwood as an actor who can also direct fine movies and encourage impressive performances out of his cast. Pretty much everybody here is on top form, even Vince Vaughn manages to shake off the taint of those tawdry 'frat pack' comedies and play a genuine character for once.
But Hal Holbrook as old Ron Franz really is a standout. I've never seen a more heartfelt or touching performance in so long. It's a real shame he was conned out of the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. I think it's great that Sean Penn brought Holbrook (now 82) back for such an important and thought-provoking role. If you don't shed a tear for him then you have no soul.
Don't con yourself out of a good movie. It may have a limited release but Into the Wild is a film worth taking time out to see. Since I live in the UK, the story of Christopher McCandless (which appears to be some sort of true urban legend in America) is not well known here. I guess that having no expectations of the film made me enjoy it on the right level.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Moving and Inspiring
Comment: Just finished watching this film for the 2nd time. Cried like a baby both times. Between the direction, and Hirsch's, Keener's, Vaughn's (whom I usually can't stand) and (in my opinion) most notably Holbrook's performances, this has become one of my favorite films of the year. I know Holbrook's part was small, but he was amazing, and I really feel that he should have won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. Anyway, the scene with him and Hirsch in Ron's jeep is heartbreaking. When he asks Alex to let him adopt him, then realizing that he will never see Alex again, very sad. Kudos to Penn for his direction and screenplay.
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
This is the true story of Christopher McCandless (Emile Hirsch). Freshly graduated from college with a promising future ahead, McCandless instead walked out of his privileged life and into the wild in search of adventure. What happened to him on the way transformed this young wanderer into an enduring symbol for countless people -- a fearless risk-taker who wrestled with the precarious balance between man and nature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
